Sunday, October 19, 2025

CLASSIC: John From Conn slams Curtis Sleaze-wa on CT radio!!!

Acting as a TRP Commando, John From Conn Slams the Brooklyn blow hard on a local CT talk radio show, The Vinnie Penn Project! Vinnie gets a lesson of TRP education! Frank & John comment...

CLICK HERE: to PLAY or DOWNLOAD or USE PLAY BAR below
at

Saturday, October 18, 2025

🤣 😂 🤣

at

It truly is a "hate America rally" or are they just too stupid to know what this week's bs is about...

at

We definitely support a NO QUEENS protest!

at

DJT does not like Da Nang Dick!

at

Friday, October 17, 2025

From the guy that lost his way all the way to a massage parlor...

at

Leftist efficiency at it's best...

at

We all know ground zero of the Leftist rat infestation...

at

Thursday, October 16, 2025

A Leftist Goes Back In Time To Kill Hitler... 😅🤣😂

at

Democrats-- a party animated by the most dangerous principles!

at

The Neo-Bolshevik way...

at

Wednesday, October 15, 2025

Yes we want to know!

at

Climate stability?

at

Thank you DJT! As we say, "Leftist Devils!"

at

Playing chess...

at

Tuesday, October 14, 2025

Not bad for a mere unfunded political movement...

at

FDR was a megalomaniac and a criminal!

at

Just what we imagined...

at

Monday, October 13, 2025

The results of peace through strength...

at

DJT the Prince of Peace! Just Amazing!! How silly and sophomoric does all the Leftist WW3 talk look now....

at

Hail Cristoforo Colombo the GREATEST EXPLORER OF ALL TIME!!!

DJT PLEASE restore ALL that the hateful Left tore down!

 

Desecrated by the Leftist Devils July 4th 2020! (Still not restored.)

at

Sorry boys & girls we have no chance...

at

Sunday, October 12, 2025

Of course...

at

Thomas Jefferson & Republicanism versus elitist Leftist Federalist Hamilton...

at

Saturday, October 11, 2025

🤔

at

Friday, October 10, 2025

The Left have always feared truth! Rutgers is now a Leftist cesspool!

at

Thursday, October 9, 2025

🫶🫶🫶

at

Drill Baby Drill & Dig Baby Dig!

at

Wednesday, October 8, 2025

DJT the Prince of Peace!

at

Finally justice comes to Illinois...

at

Elizabeth Warren's Beringian roots finally proven?

at

Tuesday, October 7, 2025

Faux News pushing Leftist Propaganda by Andrew Bates... Before founding Wolfpack Strategies, Bates worked in the White House during the Biden and Obama administrations and on the presidential campaigns of both Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton...

 


Trump's shutdown is jackpot for billionaires while working Americans pay Trump's shutdown is jackpot for billionaires while working Americans pay

at

Watching Raiders of the Lost Ark something seemed out of place...🤔🤔🤔

at

Pam Strong!

at

Monday, October 6, 2025

😁😁😁

at

Sunday, October 5, 2025

See something say something to DJT!

at

Saturday, October 4, 2025

😅😅😅

at

Friday, October 3, 2025

🤔

at

J6 truth... Never Forget!

at

Nick arrested in an attempt to silence him...

at

Thursday, October 2, 2025

🚨BREAKING🚨💪💪💪

at

More truth...

at

Is there anything uglier either?

at

Wednesday, October 1, 2025

😂🤣😅

at

Tru dat! 😂🤣😅

at

Go ahead make our day...

at

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

😅🤣😂

at

Sunday, September 28, 2025

Never ending with these Leftist Devils...

at

Saturday, September 27, 2025

The silent majority has finally had enough with Left-wing insanity...

at

Friday, September 26, 2025

Keep your Leftist dog on a short leash!

at

The Foreign Occupier & his staff's ass cheeks are puckering...

at

Ye Olde Conspiracy Theorists unite!

at

Thursday, September 25, 2025

🤔

at

😅😂🤣

at

DJT ultimate troll...

at

Wednesday, September 24, 2025

Disgraceful piece of human garbage...

at

The evidence is overwhelming. By written compact, solemnly ratified, the States agreed mutually to delegate certain of their sovereign powers to a Federal government. They enumerated these powers. All other powers they reserved to themselves, and these reserved powers did not need to be enumerated: The reserved powers constituted all inherent powers of sovereign States, not specifically abridged...



    Our system of government, said Chief Justice McKean (1798 Cobbett case), “seems to me to differ, in form and spirit, from all other governments that have heretofore existed in the world.” Following the reasoning of Madison in the Federalist and in the Virginia Convention of 1788, McKean found the Union “as to some particulars national, in others Federal, and in all the residue territorial, or in districts called States.” 

    Continuing, he said: “The division of power between the national, Federal, and State governments (all derived from the same source, the authority of the people) must be collected from the Constitution of the United States. Before it was adopted, the several States had absolute and unlimited sovereignty within their respective boundaries; all the powers, legislative, executive and judicial, excepting those granted to Congress under the old Constitution. They now enjoy them all, excepting such as are granted to the government of the United States by the present instrument and the adopted amendments, which are for particular purposes only. The government of the United States forms a part of the government of each State; its jurisdiction extends to the providing for the common defense against exterior injuries and violence, the regulation of commerce, and other matters specially enumerated in the Constitution; all other powers remain in the individual States, comprehending the interior and other concerns. These combined, form one complete government. Should there be any defect in this form of government, or any collision occur, it cannot be remedied by the sole act of the Congress or the State; the people must be resorted to, for enlargement or modification. If a State should differ with the United States about the construction of them, there is no common umpire but the people, who should adjust the affair by making amendments in the constitutional way, or suffer from the defect. . . . There is no provision in the Constitution, that in such a case the judges of the Supreme Court of the United States shall control and be conclusive; neither can the Congress by a law confer that power. There appears to be a defect in this matter. . . .”

    Was this understanding of the Constitution simply a Southern sentiment?

    Let us note what the Connecticut Assembly said in 1809 concerning the Federal embargo, “Resolved, that to preserve the Union, and support the Constitution of the United States, it becomes the duty of the Legislatures of the States, in such a crisis of affairs, vigilantly to watch over, and vigorously to maintain, the powers not delegated to the United States, but reserved to the States respectively, or to the people; and that a due regard to this duty, will not permit this Assembly to assist, or concur in giving effect to the aforesaid unconstitutional act, passed, to enforce the embargo.”

    Let us also note carefully what the Connecticut Assembly declared (during the run up to the War of 1812 to which the Rhode Island, Massachusetts & the Vermont Legislatures concurred) considering their rights under the Constitution—this is Connecticut speaking:

“The people of this State were among the first to adopt that Constitution. . . . They have a deep interest in its preservation, and are still disposed to yield a willing and prompt obedience to all the legitimate requirements of the Constitution of the United States.

But it must not be forgotten, that the State of Connecticut is a FREE SOVEREIGN and INDEPENDENT State; that the United States are a confederacy of States; that we are a confederated and not a consolidated Republic. The Governor of this State is under a high and solemn obligation, “to maintain the lawful rights and privileges thereof, as a sovereign, free and independent State,” as he is “to support the Constitution of the United States,” and the obligation to support the latter imposes an additional obligation to support the former. The building cannot stand, if the pillars upon which it rests, are impaired or destroyed. [Emphasis in the original.]”

    Then Massachusetts speaking on the new embargo of 1814:

“A power to regulate commerce is abused, when employed to destroy it; and a manifest and voluntary abuse of power sanctions the right of resistance, as much as a direct and palpable usurpation. The sovereignty reserved to the States, was reserved to protect the citizens from acts of violence by the United States, as well as for purposes of domestic regulation. We spurn the idea that the free, sovereign and independent State of Massachusetts is reduced to a mere municipal corporation, without power to protect its people, and to defend them from oppression, from whatever quarter it comes. Whenever the national compact is violated, and the citizens of this State are oppressed by cruel and unauthorized laws, this Legislature is bound to interpose its power, and wrest from the oppressor his victim.”

    Also this is Wisconsin in 1859 speaking against the Federal fugitive slave act:

“Resolved, That the government formed by the Constitution of the United States was not the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; but that, as in all other cases of compact among parties having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.

Resolved, that the principle and construction contended for by the party which now rules in the councils of the nation, that the general government is the exclusive judge of the extent of the powers delegated to it, stop nothing short of despotism, since the discretion of those who administer the government, and not the Constitution, would be the measure of their powers; that the several States which formed that instrument, being sovereign and independent, have the unquestionable right to judge of its infractions; and that a positive defiance of those sovereignties, of all unauthorized acts done or attempted to be done under color of that instrument, is the rightful remedy.”
at

Tuesday, September 23, 2025

😅🤣😂

at

Climate change hoax... beautifully said DJT!

at

For Keith No Leniency...

at

The first step is to admit to your crimes and then beg for leniency...

at

Monday, September 22, 2025

😂🤣😅

at

Sunday, September 21, 2025

Our eyes are full of tears but our hearts are filled with vigilance...

at

Left-wing scum you have no idea! 👏💪👏💪🫡🫡🫡

at

Saturday, September 20, 2025

💪💪💪

at

Friday, September 19, 2025

AOC takes to the House floor in an attempt to incite the Right to violence... Stay Strong & don't fall for common Neo-Bolshevik tactics!

at

Here we go targeting the poor Muslim community again...

at

Thursday, September 18, 2025

The Left's hypocrisy knows no bounds...

at

James Madison's Report of 1800 reiterating the Principles of '98... (Against extra-judicial usurpation, judicial overreach, & unconstitutional centralization...)



“That, in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the States, who are parties thereto, have the right and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights, and liberties appertaining to them.”

This is the heart and soul of the “right to interpose.” The language was to be re-affirmed, substantially verbatim, by the Hartford Convention in 1814; by the Wisconsin Legislature in 1859; and by the Virginia General Assembly in 1956. When men talk of the “Doctrine of ’98,” this is what they are talking about. Let Madison speak at length, and without interruption:

    "It appears to your committee to be a plain principle, founded in common sense, illustrated by common practice, and essential to the nature of compacts, that, where resort can be had to no tribunal, superior to the authority of the parties, the parties themselves must be the rightful judges in the last resort, whether the bargain made has been pursued or violated. The Constitution of the United States was formed by the sanction of the States, given by each in its sovereign capacity. It adds to the stability and dignity, as well as to the authority of the Constitution, that it rests on this legitimate and solid foundation. The States, then, being the parties to the constitutional compact, and in their sovereign capacity, it follows of necessity, that there can be no tribunal above their authority, to decide in the last resort, whether the compact made by them be violated; and, consequently, that, as the parties to it, they must themselves decide, in the last resort, such questions as may be of sufficient magnitude to require their interposition.


    It does not follow, however, that because the States, as sovereign parties to their constitutional compact, must ultimately decide whether it has been violated, that such a decision ought to be interposed, either in a hasty manner, or on doubtful and inferior occasions. Even in the case of ordinary conventions between different nations, where, by the strict rule of interpretation, a breach of a part may be deemed a breach of the whole, every part being deemed a condition of every other part and of the whole, it is always laid down that the breach must be both wilful and material to justify an application of the rule. But in the case of an intimate and constitutional union, like that of the United States, it is evident that the interposition of the parties, in their sovereign capacity, can be called for by occasions only, deeply and essentially affecting the vital principles of their political system.


    The resolution has accordingly guarded against any misapprehension of its object, by expressly requiring for such an interposition, the case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous breach of the Constitution, by the exercise of powers not granted by it. It must be a case, not of a light and transient nature, but of a nature dangerous to the great purposes for which the Constitution was established. It must be a case, moreover, not obscure or doubtful in its construction, but plain and palpable. Lastly, it must be a case not resulting from a partial consideration, or hasty determination; but a case stamped with a final consideration and deliberate adherence. It is not necessary, because the resolution does not require that the question should be discussed, how far the exercise of any particular power, ungranted by the Constitution, would justify the interposition of the parties to it. As cases might easily be stated, which none would contend ought to fall with- in that description, cases, on the other hand, might, with equal ease, be stated, so flagrant and so fatal, as to unite every opinion in placing them within that description.


    But the resolution has done more than guard against misconstruction, by expressly referring to cases of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous nature. It specifies the object of the interposition which it contemplates, to be solely that of arresting the progress of the evil of usurpation, and of maintaining the authorities, rights, and liberties appertaining to the States, as parties to the Constitution.


    From this view of the resolution, it would seem inconceivable that it can incur any just disapprobation from those who, laying aside all momentary impressions, and recollecting the genuine source and object of the Federal Constitution, shall candidly and accurately interpret the meaning of the General Assembly. If the deliberate exercise of dangerous powers, palpably withheld by the Constitution, could not justify the parties to it, in interposing even so far as to arrest the progress of the evil, and thereby to preserve the Constitution itself, as well as to provide for the safety of the parties to it, there would be an end to all relief from usurped power, and a direct subversion of the rights specified or recognised under all the State constitutions, as well as a plain denial of the fundamental principle on which our independence itself was declared.


    But it is objected that the judicial authority is to be regarded as the sole expositor of the Constitution, in the last resort; and it may be asked for what reason, the declaration by the General Assembly, supposing it to be theoretically true, could be required at the present day and in so solemn a manner.


    On this objection it might be observed, first, that there may be instances of usurped power, which the forms of the Constitution would never draw within the control of the judicial department; secondly, that if the decision of the judiciary be raised above the authority of the sovereign parties to the Constitution, the decisions of the other departments, not carried by the forms of the Constitution before the judiciary, must be equally authoritative and final with the decisions of that department. But the proper answer to the objection is, that the resolution of the General Assembly relates to those great and extraordinary cases, in which all the forms of the Constitution may prove ineffectual against infractions dangerous to the essential rights of the parties to it. The resolution supposes that dangerous powers, not delegated, may not only be usurped and executed by the other departments, but that the judicial department also may exercise or sanction dangerous powers beyond the grant of the Constitution; and, consequently, that the ultimate right of the parties to the Constitution, to judge whether the compact has been dangerously violated, must extend to violations by one delegated authority, as well as by another; by the judiciary, as well as by the executive, or the legislature.


    However true, therefore, it may be, that the judicial department, is, in all questions submitted to it by the forms of the Constitution, to decide in the last resort, this resort must necessarily be deemed the last in relation to the authorities of the other departments of the government; not in relation to the rights of the parties to the constitutional compact, from which the judicial as well as the other departments hold their delegated trusts. On any other hypothesis, the delegation of judicial power would annul the authority delegating it; and the concurrence of this department with the others in usurped powers, might subvert forever, and beyond the possible reach of any rightful remedy, the very Constitution which all were instituted to preserve.


    The truth declared in the resolution being established, the expediency of making the declaration at the present day, may safely be left to the temperate consideration and candid judgment of the American public. It will be remembered that a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles, is solemnly enjoined by most of the State constitutions, and particularly by our own, as a necessary safeguard against the danger of degeneracy to which republics are liable, as well as other governments, though in a less degree than others. And a fair comparison of the political doctrines not unfrequent at the present day, with those which characterized the epoch of our revolution, and which form the basis of our republican constitutions, will best determine whether the declaratory recurrence here made to those principles, ought to be viewed as unseasonable and improper, or as a vigilant discharge of an important duty. The authority of constitutions over governments, and of the sovereignty of the people over constitutions, are truths which are at all times necessary to be kept in mind; and at no time perhaps more necessary than at the present."


MADISON'S FULL REPORT OF 1800


at

The dark Left exposed...

at

Wednesday, September 17, 2025

Remove these 4 quisling collaborators from office!

at

Another Neo-Bolshevik down!

at

Centralized Government Complex Leftist Devils!

at
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)