Monday, September 22, 2025

😂🤣😅

at

Sunday, September 21, 2025

Our eyes are full of tears but our hearts are filled with vigilance...

at

Left-wing scum you have no idea! 👏💪👏💪🫡🫡🫡

at

Saturday, September 20, 2025

💪💪💪

at

Friday, September 19, 2025

AOC takes to the House floor in an attempt to incite the Right to violence... Stay Strong & don't fall for common Neo-Bolshevik tactics!

at

Here we go targeting the poor Muslim community again...

at

Thursday, September 18, 2025

The Left's hypocrisy knows no bounds...

at

James Madison's Report of 1800 reiterating the Principles of '98... (Against extra-judicial usurpation, judicial overreach, & unconstitutional centralization...)



“That, in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the States, who are parties thereto, have the right and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights, and liberties appertaining to them.”

This is the heart and soul of the “right to interpose.” The language was to be re-affirmed, substantially verbatim, by the Hartford Convention in 1814; by the Wisconsin Legislature in 1859; and by the Virginia General Assembly in 1956. When men talk of the “Doctrine of ’98,” this is what they are talking about. Let Madison speak at length, and without interruption:

    "It appears to your committee to be a plain principle, founded in common sense, illustrated by common practice, and essential to the nature of compacts, that, where resort can be had to no tribunal, superior to the authority of the parties, the parties themselves must be the rightful judges in the last resort, whether the bargain made has been pursued or violated. The Constitution of the United States was formed by the sanction of the States, given by each in its sovereign capacity. It adds to the stability and dignity, as well as to the authority of the Constitution, that it rests on this legitimate and solid foundation. The States, then, being the parties to the constitutional compact, and in their sovereign capacity, it follows of necessity, that there can be no tribunal above their authority, to decide in the last resort, whether the compact made by them be violated; and, consequently, that, as the parties to it, they must themselves decide, in the last resort, such questions as may be of sufficient magnitude to require their interposition.


    It does not follow, however, that because the States, as sovereign parties to their constitutional compact, must ultimately decide whether it has been violated, that such a decision ought to be interposed, either in a hasty manner, or on doubtful and inferior occasions. Even in the case of ordinary conventions between different nations, where, by the strict rule of interpretation, a breach of a part may be deemed a breach of the whole, every part being deemed a condition of every other part and of the whole, it is always laid down that the breach must be both wilful and material to justify an application of the rule. But in the case of an intimate and constitutional union, like that of the United States, it is evident that the interposition of the parties, in their sovereign capacity, can be called for by occasions only, deeply and essentially affecting the vital principles of their political system.


    The resolution has accordingly guarded against any misapprehension of its object, by expressly requiring for such an interposition, the case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous breach of the Constitution, by the exercise of powers not granted by it. It must be a case, not of a light and transient nature, but of a nature dangerous to the great purposes for which the Constitution was established. It must be a case, moreover, not obscure or doubtful in its construction, but plain and palpable. Lastly, it must be a case not resulting from a partial consideration, or hasty determination; but a case stamped with a final consideration and deliberate adherence. It is not necessary, because the resolution does not require that the question should be discussed, how far the exercise of any particular power, ungranted by the Constitution, would justify the interposition of the parties to it. As cases might easily be stated, which none would contend ought to fall with- in that description, cases, on the other hand, might, with equal ease, be stated, so flagrant and so fatal, as to unite every opinion in placing them within that description.


    But the resolution has done more than guard against misconstruction, by expressly referring to cases of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous nature. It specifies the object of the interposition which it contemplates, to be solely that of arresting the progress of the evil of usurpation, and of maintaining the authorities, rights, and liberties appertaining to the States, as parties to the Constitution.


    From this view of the resolution, it would seem inconceivable that it can incur any just disapprobation from those who, laying aside all momentary impressions, and recollecting the genuine source and object of the Federal Constitution, shall candidly and accurately interpret the meaning of the General Assembly. If the deliberate exercise of dangerous powers, palpably withheld by the Constitution, could not justify the parties to it, in interposing even so far as to arrest the progress of the evil, and thereby to preserve the Constitution itself, as well as to provide for the safety of the parties to it, there would be an end to all relief from usurped power, and a direct subversion of the rights specified or recognised under all the State constitutions, as well as a plain denial of the fundamental principle on which our independence itself was declared.


    But it is objected that the judicial authority is to be regarded as the sole expositor of the Constitution, in the last resort; and it may be asked for what reason, the declaration by the General Assembly, supposing it to be theoretically true, could be required at the present day and in so solemn a manner.


    On this objection it might be observed, first, that there may be instances of usurped power, which the forms of the Constitution would never draw within the control of the judicial department; secondly, that if the decision of the judiciary be raised above the authority of the sovereign parties to the Constitution, the decisions of the other departments, not carried by the forms of the Constitution before the judiciary, must be equally authoritative and final with the decisions of that department. But the proper answer to the objection is, that the resolution of the General Assembly relates to those great and extraordinary cases, in which all the forms of the Constitution may prove ineffectual against infractions dangerous to the essential rights of the parties to it. The resolution supposes that dangerous powers, not delegated, may not only be usurped and executed by the other departments, but that the judicial department also may exercise or sanction dangerous powers beyond the grant of the Constitution; and, consequently, that the ultimate right of the parties to the Constitution, to judge whether the compact has been dangerously violated, must extend to violations by one delegated authority, as well as by another; by the judiciary, as well as by the executive, or the legislature.


    However true, therefore, it may be, that the judicial department, is, in all questions submitted to it by the forms of the Constitution, to decide in the last resort, this resort must necessarily be deemed the last in relation to the authorities of the other departments of the government; not in relation to the rights of the parties to the constitutional compact, from which the judicial as well as the other departments hold their delegated trusts. On any other hypothesis, the delegation of judicial power would annul the authority delegating it; and the concurrence of this department with the others in usurped powers, might subvert forever, and beyond the possible reach of any rightful remedy, the very Constitution which all were instituted to preserve.


    The truth declared in the resolution being established, the expediency of making the declaration at the present day, may safely be left to the temperate consideration and candid judgment of the American public. It will be remembered that a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles, is solemnly enjoined by most of the State constitutions, and particularly by our own, as a necessary safeguard against the danger of degeneracy to which republics are liable, as well as other governments, though in a less degree than others. And a fair comparison of the political doctrines not unfrequent at the present day, with those which characterized the epoch of our revolution, and which form the basis of our republican constitutions, will best determine whether the declaratory recurrence here made to those principles, ought to be viewed as unseasonable and improper, or as a vigilant discharge of an important duty. The authority of constitutions over governments, and of the sovereignty of the people over constitutions, are truths which are at all times necessary to be kept in mind; and at no time perhaps more necessary than at the present."


MADISON'S FULL REPORT OF 1800


at

The dark Left exposed...

at

Wednesday, September 17, 2025

Remove these 4 quisling collaborators from office!

at

Another Neo-Bolshevik down!

at

Centralized Government Complex Leftist Devils!

at

The evil machinations of Big Pharma...

at

Charlie was spot on here...

at

Tuesday, September 16, 2025

Tyler Robinson texts with that fury trans thing...

at

Exposing Neo-Bolshevism...

at

Monday, September 15, 2025

😅🤣😂

at

BS is right!

at

Neo-Bolshevik hatred calling for violence over debate...

at

Sunday, September 14, 2025

The long lost "Thomas Jefferson recommended" Richmond Enquirer articles! (A series on extra-judicial usurpation, judicial overreach, & unconstitutional centralization...)


Thomas Jefferson specifically referenced these articles from the Richmond Enquirer (1821) as it closely reflected his views on judicial overreach.

He and his Republican followers believed that Leftist Chief Justice John Marshall and the Federalist dominated Supreme Court went against the will of the majority of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 & against the State ratifying Convention compromises of 1788. That they also went against the vast majority of the people of the United States with the Cohens vs. Virginia decision (1821.) "No one measure has made so alarming a breach in our political institutions..."

Jefferson perfectly stated that the justices, "squeezed their own meaning out of the text... using the slipperiness of the eels of law." That they invented constructions in favor of their own prejudices and love of power.

This decision (and several others before & after) started the "extra-judicial" consolidation of power into the hands of the Federal government instead of leaving it where it belongs; decentralized with the people of each individual sovereign State.

"It is, therefore, with the deepest concern that the advocates of the rights of the States have seen this odious and exploded doctrine revived to serve as a foundation for yet more novel and extravagant pretensions."

"Though we can discern the possibility of occasional inconvenience from ill-advised measures in the States, we see everything to fear from inroads upon their authority, and a destruction of their independence."

"The court, feeling the full force of the 11th amendment, have assailed it with all the objections which ingenuity can suggest or imagination conceive."

"The Cohens case must excite alarm in the mind of every man, who feels any attachment to the independence of the States."

"When the whole case is fairly laid open to the American people... No man is so blind as not to perceive, that a death blow has been aimed at the very existence of the States."


These articles prophetically predicted the messes that would ensue when the agreed upon rigorous and straightforward original construction of the Constitution is violated!

"Whether it is openly violated, or secretly undermined by the insidious arts of construction-- political death is ultimately the consequence. [Loose] Construction is the vampyre which sucks out the life-blood of the Constitution!"

"The Supreme court, by the latitude of construction in which they have indulged, have rendered the Constitution the sport of legal ingenuity."

"They have converted exceptions into the general rules, and built their jurisdiction on the unsubstantial basis of political necessity."

"The whole of this opinion is extrajudicial and the court has departed from the strict rules of judicial propriety, in order to impose their own political opinions on the public."

"It is in vain that our statesmen have displayed so much solicitude in erecting dykes to defend liberty from the restless intrusions of lawless power, if their bulwarks may be undermined by the insidious attacks of construction."

"The time is not very distant when our great charter will be buried in a heap of commentaries; and no man will think of taking the original text, in its simple majesty, until he has first ascertained how far the ponderous volumes of grave jurists will permit him to go."

"The court has paid too little attention to the text of the Constitution; they have given a partial history of the State opinions which preceded its adoption-- and from this history have deduced consequences fatal to the power of the States."

"Let the States consider this as a salutary warning of what they are to expect from the 'impartial' tribunal of the Supreme court." 

"The people [of the States] of America, well aware of all these dangers, and wishing to confine all future statesmen to plain rules of construction, which might easily be grasped by every capacity, have given a Constitution with a strict enumeration of all powers which belong to the Federal government. Not content with leaving this important subject to implication, they adopted the 10th Amendment to the Constitution."

"It remains to be seen whether the people will submit to be cheated out of this rich inheritance, by the paultry arts of verbal construction."


These articles also definitively prove that the War to Prevent Southern Independence was fundamentally about much more than just the status of slaves. The true causa causans was the incremental extension of the powers of the Federal government beyond that which was originally intended. Those powers not specifically delegated were reserved!

"The Dangers of the Union..."

"Our well balanced political system... is likely to be disturbed and its harmony interrupted, by the establishment of principles now for the first time avowed."

"If such a construction of the Constitution had been fairly avowed it may be confidently pronounced that the plan of the Convention would have been rejected, and the Constitution would have been looked upon rather as a scheme for our subjugation, than as the charter for our liberties and the ark of our salvation."

These great men firmly believed that if these wrongful constructions were to be followed, "a violent collision may ensue... ultimately terminating in civil war."

(Referenced: Thomas Jefferson to William Johnson, 12 June 1823)

















at

Saturday, September 13, 2025

Making sense now.... oh no he is no Leftist... you pathetic scum on the Left...

at

The simple historically proven fact is: that the Left does not value all human life as we do...

Our sentinels have slept; and the few alarms they have sounded in recent years have come too late...

at

Friday, September 12, 2025

Blood on Democrat hands... The party of hate...

at

🤔

at

Your Leftist indoctrinated murdering hitman...

at

😁

at

Thursday, September 11, 2025

While technology can solve some problems, mass production and universal happiness, it can also separate us from our own humanity...

at

See a potential pattern?

at

Suspected Leftist Devil...

at

Let the Leftist hunt begin...

at

Remember September 10th 2025 and where you were...

at

The Ministry of Hate...

at

Wednesday, September 10, 2025

We have always said these Leftist Devils would kill you if they could... Terrorist hate crime! Thoughts go out to Charlie Kirk's family...

at

Let's go now it is time to tighten it up Secret Service!!! Purge all Leftists within your ranks today!!! Not tomorrow TODAY!!!

at

Tuesday, September 9, 2025

As we have always said Democrats lie that's all they do...

at

Monday, September 8, 2025

Yet another Democrat Racial Justice Warrior...

at

🤣😂😅

at

Sunday, September 7, 2025

The Sovereign States... & what they fought for...

   The great and leading principle is, that the General Government emanated from the people of the several States, forming distinct political communities, and acting in their separate and sovereign capacity, and not from all of the people forming one aggregate political community; that the Constitution of the United States is, in fact, a compact, to which each State is a party, in the character already described; and that the several States, or parties, have a right to judge of its infractions; and in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of power not delegated, they have the right, in the last resort, to use the language of the Virginia Resolutions, “to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining, within their respective limits, the authorities, rights, and liberties appertaining to them.”

   This right of interposition, thus solemnly asserted by the State of Virginia, be it called what it may—State-right, veto, nullification, or by any other name—I conceive to be the fundamental principle of our system, resting on facts historically as certain as our revolution itself, and deductions as simple and demonstrative as that of any political or moral truth whatever; and I firmly believe that on its recognition depend the stability and safety of our political institutions. . .


John C. Calhoun      

Fort Hill, July 26 1831


THE SOVEREIGN STATES:

Notes of a Citizen of Virginia

JAMES JACKSON KILPATRICK



at

Saturday, September 6, 2025

Animal Farm...


at

🤔 AI going too far now...

at

Friday, September 5, 2025

Democrat = Disinformation

at

Thursday, September 4, 2025

Leftist crimes against humanity!

at

💪💪🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🦅🦅🦅💪💪

at

😅😂🤣

at

Wednesday, September 3, 2025

Typical of Leftism...

at

Oh Gavin...

at

Tuesday, September 2, 2025

The sad state of Leftism...

at

😂

at
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)